An Exorcism at an Abortion Clinic: A study in solidarity, Left to Right

May 19th, 2012

Five years ago this morning one of the most unique ecumenical services in Indiana history took place at 827 Webster Street.  The property had just been redeemed from the abortion industry — Susan Hill in particular, who had controlled it for 28 years since personally opening Fort Wayne’s first abortion clinic in 1978.  (She has since gone to meet her Maker, more here).

May 19, 2007 was the initial launch of the ArchAngel Institute, which would then be founded as an Indiana corporation a few weeks later.

The event opened and closed with Fort Wayne Police Department bagpipers filling Salon Plaza (the adjacent park) with  haunting, sacred music.

Followed by Father David Meinzen (then an Eastern Orthodox priest) and Deacon Mike Myers with an Orthodox  exorcism.

Followed by Father George Gabet with a traditional Roman Catholic blessing and casting out of Evil.

Followed by Frank Avila with a memorial to his dear wife Phyllis (here) and those who stood against the abortion industry in the early years of resistance in the Fort.

Followed by Lynn Wegmann’s reading from Luther’s Small Catechism.

Followed by Evangelical Pastor Wendell Brane’s dedication of the building.

Ending with more bagpipes from the very organization that used to arrest pro-lifers in front of the very building that was redeemed to serve as the headquarters of The ArchAngel Institute.

Kevin Brown reported that as the pipers closed the ceremony two doves flew down Webster Street, circled in front of the building, and flew off.  It brought tears to his eyes.

The events were not without controversy.  The Left, both in Kansas and Indiana and even nationwide, went apoplectic over the thought that anyone would think an exorcism was necessary after an abortionist left the building.  (We estimate 24,000 abortions over 28 years at the location.)  The Leftists offended would include Dr. Elizabeth Bowman, the outspoken pro-gay rights,  pro-abortion psychiatrist who would later be assigned by me by the Supreme Court of Indiana.  (Click here and here for more on Dr. Bowman’s views on exorcism.  The government could not have located a psychiatrist more biased against everything that I have ever stood for in her.)  Here, by comparison, is the report on me (Brown) by a Board certified (non-government-agent-hand-picked, professionally-oriented (rather than agenda-driven) and statutorily-briefed (rather than anti-Brown briefed)  psychiatrist). (In defense of Dr. Bowman, it appears that the government social workers failed to brief her on the actual law to be used during her evaluation — not that the law matters to the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program, comrades.)   Note that Dr. Flueckiger, unlike Dr. Bowman (but like every other professional mental health agent or agency who reviewed me) found no label to attach to my toe, actually diagnosed me as having no mental illness.  (But then they did not want the ArchAngel project shot down first and foremost.)  The Left was unified, solidarity ensured, in the goal of seeing this project fail from before it even started — and even more zealous toward that end once the ArchAngel Institute was publicly announced.

 

And then there is the Christian Right.

Pre-arranged Catholic media abandoned the dedication event before it happened (due to anticipated controversy from a whispering campaign noted in third paragraph of the Blee letter posted  here), I was informed the diocese had been offended by the event (right after it happened, but that was cleared up later and we received the Bishop’s full blessing (here)), and years later I learned that the largest pro-life organization in NorthEast Indiana was quite upset about the very launch of the ArchAngel Institute, even labeling the Institute an “enemy,” a group adverse to forward pro-life progress.  (Or is it actually Wilsonian-style progressivism that the neo-conservative advances?) (In all fairness, statements like this are considered the work of the enemy by those loyal to the National Right to Life lobbyist association.)

Oh, and I like to think that Saturday, May 19, 2007  ruined Ole Slew foot’s weekend as well.

I know it had quite an impact upon me.  One that keeps on giving.  It was starting off on the wrong foot on Webster Street, if Dale Carnegie was to be consulted, anyway.  (He was not.)

Still, it was the right thing to do.  I do not regret it, it simply had to be done.  (I  had asked the RCC for an exorcism, was told buildings were not exorcised, only people.  The Orthodox priest then called me when he heard of  the planned dedication service and stated that I simply had to start with an exorcism. Thus we did, gladly.  Incense, vestments, icons — Father Meinzen and Deacon Myers rendered  it a unique, historic and beautiful event.)

Details are posted in the May 2007 archives, here.

p.s. Thanks to John and Berenice Brown and Max and Linda Zimmerman for much help on the May 19, 2007 event.  Especially John and Bernie for buying the building!  And especially to Linda for coordinating the police pipers and Max and Linda for getting the event on video.  Someday I will have to find someone to help me make the transition to You Tube so I can post that fine video of this unique event.  (Hint, hint, anyone out there wanting to help with some You Tube programming as part and parcel of the sinking of this Titanic?  Short term commitments are the norm for us now!)

An example of solidarity … from an office of the Church

May 14th, 2012

Having determined that the metaphorical bilge pumps were failing and that thus a metaphorical Davie Jones’ locker was close at hand for this metaphorical Titanic, I determined it best to press the Diocese for a statement that could be posted in this venue, a kind of wreath in the sea if you will.

It is presented against the hope that future ships hitting the hard ice like I did will enjoy the full and unreserved support of the Church — before the pumps give out.

 

 

Roger Waters seems highly appropriate in this late hour for the ArchAngel Institute. Dedicated to George Ulrich Klopfer and his highly placed defenders in the Indiana judiciary, that would be the governmental-abortion industry complex, aka the promoters of the culture of death ….

A petition for certiorari? An example of no solidarity

May 11th, 2012

 

Readers have likely noted this post over the past nine weeks, noted that it was password protected.
No more.  All are free to read it now.  
I have contacted just about every Christian Right and/or Conservative public interest firm and/or Libertarian (First Amendment) public interest firm seeking representation to take me on up to the United States Supreme Court.  (I just could not bring myself to ask the ACLU … although I did send the ICLU an email asking if they wanted to discuss my case — they did not.) 
None have agreed to aid the Institute in its most pressing hour.  Most will not even discuss the matter with me.  (Like the ICLU, only without the good reason that the Christian-disliking ICLU has.)
Most all attorneys who do speak with me agree that I have documented unconstitutional acts and Christian persecution.  It just is not worth the time of the Christian public interest law firms to act upon it, for the investment is unlikely to pay off in either justice done or funds raised.
Such is the state of solidarity among the conservative movement in America.  (The Left does a much better job of looking after their own.)
Now begins the post that those Christian and conservative firms were invited to review.
Brown v. Bowman, Ross, Sudrovech and Harrell, No.11-2164 (7th Cir) was denied en banc review on March 2, 2012.  Thus a petition for certiorari must be filed at the SCOTUS by no later than Monday, June 4, 2012 to be timely filed.Plaintiff/Appellate Bryan Brown seeks representation on petition, the same counsel will argue the case (or designates who argues the case) if cert is granted.   Brown is willing to enter into contract agreeing to the aforementioned.

The issues in the case are best perceived by reading the following, all of which are linked:

1.  The Justicia  blog post glossing the Seventh Circuit decision and the February 2 decision

2.  Judge Theresa Spingmann’s original decision dismissing the action pursuant to the Rooker Feldman doctrine

3.   Plaintiff’s Dec. 8, 2009 verified complaint

4.  Appellant’s opening brief

5.  Appellee’s brief

6.  Appellant’s reply brief

7.  Oral Argument

8.  Plaintiff  / Appellant’s petition for en banc review

The latter lays out the path toward the SCOTUS ala a conflict between the 14th Amendment and Rooker Feldman, as well as a conflict among the circuits as to Rooker Feldman analysis.   The SCOTUS has repeated asked the lower courts to throttle down on the use of Rooker Feldman, they have not.  Brown v. Bowman could be the case the High Court uses to remove the Rooker Feldman option from the lower federal courts.

My greatest disappointment in my legal travails of the past five year  is the precedent that I leave behind.  I fear that others with Natural Law and/or Christian activism on their transcripts (i.e. Regent or Ave Maria grads, among other markers) will now face more headwinds due to my case.  The Seventh Circuit decision comes right out and says that law applicants who allege religious discrimination have no recourse to the federal courts.  As my  petition (#8 above)  argues, this could be viewed as a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and a denial of legal recourse for rights of conscience.  (Not to mention that neo-Marxists are given protections not allowed Christians under Seventh Circuit precedent as it now exists.)  Future Indiana bar applicants who reveal themselves to be likely Natural Law adherents (such as through college affiliations, clubs or letters of recommendation) may be asked to pledge to the government’s laws over God’s laws to gain a law license.  My case can be read as stating that such a price – apostasy for a law license – is an acceptable bargain to both the Indiana Supreme Court and, in Pilate-like fashion, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Supreme Court has visited Rooker Feldman three times since 2005, each time warning the lower federal courts to ramp it down.  (See #4, above).  Brown v. Bowman proves that the Seventh Circuit is resisting that ramping down order.  It even resurrected doctrines ancillary to Rooker Feldman that Justice John Paul Stevens thought to be dead and buried.  (#8 above).  There is a fine argument that Rooker Feldman does not even apply to my case (#4), and a fine argument that political correctness is a form of government corruption, of which my case is a fine example.  (#6 above).

Finally know that I filed a petition for cert with the SCOTUS coming out of the Indiana Supreme Court’s bad denial process two years ago.  That grants the foundation to argue out of John Paul Steven’s Feldman dissent for the overturning of Feldman, and thus the end of the reign of Rooker-Feldman.  (#6 and #8)

If interested in discussion the possibilities of representation please contact Bryan Brown at (260) 515-8511 or archangelinstitute@gmail.com .  I am a Kansas licensed attorney, but must defer to counsel to take me to this big dance, or not go at all.

PS  Any who doubt whether I faced headwinds due to my religious identity should read these excerpts:  http://www.archangelinstitute.org/excerpt-from-official-indiana-inquisition/

Solidarity: An example from a fine Catholic attorney from Fort Wayne

May 9th, 2012

The ArchAngel Institute owes so many thanks to so many who have stood with us over our five year lifespan.  I tendered more than 80 letters of recommendation to the Indiana Board of Law Examiners in support of my moral fitness — did not matter.  Those letters were from managers, chief counsel, business associates, close friends, co-counsel, even opposing counsel!   A local board certified psychiatrist who spent two hours interviewing me adjudged me more than sufficiently sane to be an attorney (and that is not saying much, given some of the crazy attorneys I have met and read about in Indiana).

Soon after the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program remanded me to a psychologist who had seemingly been told I was a religious nutcase I realized that there was a plan to “get me” emanating out of the culture of death.  No surprise there, they had been trying to take me out since I stood up to the them via Operation Rescue back in 1989. And when I marched as they dehydrated Baby Doe to death in 1982 (and wrote much on that in the years following).  And for attending Regent University School of Law and studying the Christian roots of our legal order.  And for working as a constitutional litigator for the American Family Association for six years, taking on abortionists and the homosexual rights movement.  And for being one of Phil Kline’s right hand men as he took on George Tiller (who I stood up to in Kansas a decade before that) and Planned Parenthood (who sued me more than once).   And for launching the ArchAngel Institute from Susan Hill’s former abortion flagship in Indiana.  And for writing things like this incident to the Institute.

Yet despite this background in religiously-driven activism I had been licensed to practice law by Kansas in 1996, with no disciplinary action ever taken against me, had been admitted to the bar of the United States Supreme Court in 2001, many other federal bars and cleared by the National Board of Law Examiners and Missouri Supreme Court the year before I attempted to join Indiana’s bar.

And then came the gang in Indianapolis.  Soon after realizing that my religion was the focus of the Examiners I sought out legal counsel.  I consulted one of the best in the business in Indianapolis — He told me that my case was quite unique, my skills as an attorney more than adequate and my history impressive.  His advice — pay him a few thousand to represent me if I had it and could part with it, or go on my own and realize that he was not all that likely to do anything that I could not.  I did not have a few thousand, and if I had, I would have been loathe to part with it given his appraisal of the situation.

I then made contact with Fort Wayne attorney Tom Blee at the recommendation of Fred Everett of the Diocese of Fort Wayne/ South Bend.  Tom spent some time with me, looked over my filings, and become alarmed that the system was seeking to nail me to a cross rather than afford me due process.

Tom Blee thus sent this letter to Tim Sudrovech to warn him, and JLAP, that the Catholic Church was keeping an eye on my processing.  This letter ended up in my file with the Indiana Law Examiners — they could not have cared less about the warning issued therein ….

 

Justice (government), Solidarity (church) and Idealism (the believer) …. a culture-healing trifecta seldom realized

May 1st, 2012

From the Church’s Magisterial catechism on social justice ….

381. Praying for rulers, which Saint Paul recommended even as he was being persecuted, implicitly indicates what political authority ought to guarantee: a calm and tranquil life led with piety and dignity (cf. 1 Tim 2:1-2). Christians must “be ready for any honest work” (Tit 3:1), showing “perfect courtesy towards all” (Tit 3:2), in the awareness that they are saved not by their own deeds but by God’s mercy. Without “the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit, which he poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Saviour” (Tit 3:5-6), all people are “foolish, disobedient, led astray, slaves to various passions and pleasures, passing [their] days in malice and envy, hated by men and hating one another” (Tit 3:3). We must not forget the miserable state of the human condition marred by sin, but redeemed by God’s love.

382. When human authority goes beyond the limits willed by God, it makes itself a deity and demands absolute submission; it becomes the Beast of the Apocalypse, an image of the power of the imperial persecutor “drunk with the blood of the saints and the blood of the martyrs of Jesus” (Rev 17:6). The Beast is served by the “false prophet” (Rev 19:20), who, with beguiling signs, induces people to adore it. This vision is a prophetic indication of the snares used by Satan to rule men, stealing his way into their spirit with lies. But Christ is the Victorious Lamb who, down the course of human history, overcomes every power that would make it absolute. Before such a power, Saint John suggests the resistance of the martyrs; in this way, believers bear witness that corrupt and satanic power is defeated, because it no longer has any authority over them.

 

 
383. The Church proclaims that Christ, the conqueror of death, reigns over the universe that he himself has redeemed. His kingdom includes even the present times and will end only when everything is handed over to the Father and human history is brought to completion in the final judgment (cf. 1 Cor 15:20-28). Christ reveals to human authority, always tempted by the desire to dominate, its authentic and complete meaning as service. God is the one Father, and Christ the one Teacher, of all mankind, and all people are brothers and sisters. Sovereignty belongs to God. The Lord, however, “has not willed to reserve to himself all exercise of power. He entrusts to every creature the functions it is capable of performing, according to the capacities of its own nature. This mode of governance ought to be followed in social life. The way God acts in governing the world, which bears witness to such great regard for human freedom, should inspire the wisdom of those who govern human communities. They should behave as ministers of divine providence”.[773]

The biblical message provides endless inspiration for Christian reflection on political power, recalling that it comes from God and is an integral part of the order that he created. This order is perceived by the human conscience and, in social life, finds its fulfilment in the truth, justice, freedom and solidarity that bring peace.[774]

SOURCE

HE IS RISEN!!!

April 8th, 2012

Click on this link to read just what that means for you …. http://www.archangelinstitute.org/he-is-risen-indeed/

Auxiliary Bishop James Conley’s endorsement of the ArchAngel Institute

March 4th, 2012

Aux. Bishop James Conley has known me (Bryan) since 1991.  He is one of my spiritual advisers and has been for 18 years now.  He explains our shared background in this clip which he prepared for our December 8 banquet, before he knew for certain that the federal litigation would be filed.  He prepared a similar — actually even  more glowing — recommendation as to my good moral character and fitness and sent it to the Indiana Board of Law Examiners last June.  Here it is. They ignored it.

Exactly what I told the Indiana Board of Law Examiners …

January 1st, 2012

… when they directly asked me, while I was under oath.   And they then used my compelled answer to deny me a law license.

 Read how the above applies to my case of law license denial right here (click) 

Psychiatrist Bryan Flueckiger on Bryan J. Brown’s mental health

May 1st, 2011

Excerpt from official Indiana inquisition

April 4th, 2011

Click on pages to enlarge. Three pages from the official transcript followed by one page from the verified complaint alleging civil rights violations. Click on the final link below to read the entire civil rights complaint.